The Dinner group develops and applies theoretical methods for relating
cellular behavior to molecular properties. We are particularly interested
in how proteins regulate access to genes in the context of the development
of the immune system. Understanding how such complex behavior arises from
physical and chemical features is a problem in fundamental statistical mechanics,
but its solution has direct implications for treating autoimmune pathologies
and improving gene therapy and vaccination strategies.
One feature that makes theoretical studies of cellular behavior challenging is that
the relevant dynamics span a hierarchy of time and length scales ranging from Angstroms
and femtoseconds to micrometers and minutes. Experiments are now beginning to
bridge gaps in spatial and temporal resolution, and models are vital for design and
interpretation of such measurements. Our research thus blends atomic-resolution
simulations with coarse-grained numerical and analytical approaches, often in
collaboration with experimental groups.
DNA transcription, recombination, replication, and repair are all regulated
by proteins that bind specific sites on DNA. Despite small copy numbers
in cells, such proteins can locate target elements among billions of base pairs
thousands of times faster than allowed by a three-dimensional random walk.
To objectively evaluate how putative search mechanisms arise in specific molecular
situations, which is essential to ultimately be able to make defined interventions,
atomic-resolution simulations based on transferable potentials are required.
Building on the transition path sampling framework introduced by David Chandler
and co-workers, we have introduced novel means for studying dynamics in complex
systems and applied them to a DNA repair system.
Computational approaches are important for understanding how cell-fate decisions are made
because the cooperative nature of the dynamics hinders intuition of responses to experimental
probes. We are thus integrating experimental data to construct phenomenological models
for the gene regulatory networks that control lineage specification of myeloid and lymphoid
cells. Presently, we are exploring various approaches beyond the mean-field to better be
able to link antigen receptor specificity with development.
Due to the availability of high throughput experimental methods for measuring molecular populations,
interpretation of data is now often the bottleneck in assembling gene regulatory and signaling
networks. Computational methods can address this problem by identifying molecular circuits consistent
with measurements. These networks can in turn be used to design further experiments to
discriminate between the suggested mechanisms. The methods that we use to integrate the rate
laws that govern gene expression are quite similar in form to those that we use to propagate the
positions of atoms in our atomic-resolution studies of DNA-binding proteins. We are seeking
to exploit this fact, together with advances in simulation methods for treating complex systems,
to improve procedures for fitting experimental data.
The gene regulatory and signaling network studies above provide examples of
all-or-none responses to smooth variations in levels of molecular species.
The fact that quantitative differences in protein levels can give rise to
qualitative changes in cellular behavior allows developmental programs to be
controlled simply through spatial localization of proteins. Because localization
is often mediated by the cytoskeleton, we are developing computational algorithms
for treating nucleation, growth, and reorganization of actin filament networks.
|